In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central - I, Mumbai v. M/S.imfa Holdings Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2.The question raised in this appeal is; whether the purchase of shares of M/s.Herberstons Limited by the assessee was in the nature of investment or stock-in-trade.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.594 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central - I, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Imfa Holdings Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Mandar Vaidya i/by Roy's Law firm for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. DATE : 5[th] April, 2011.
1.Not on board. Taken up for admission by consent of both the
parties.
2.The question raised in this appeal is; whether the purchase of shares of M/s.Herberstons Limited by the assessee was in the nature of investment or stock-in-trade. The Tribunal has recorded a finding of fact that although ordinarily the shares were purchased as investment, in the present case, the purchase of shares was on trading account and the loss incurred on account of sale of said shares was trading loss, eligible for set off against the income in the assessment year in question. The finding recorded by the Tribunal is a finding of fact. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.