The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – I, Mumbai v. M/S.nestler Limited
High Court
23 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – I, Mumbai v. M/S.nestler Limited
Date of order
23 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – I, Mumbai v. M/S.nestler Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2469 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – I, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Nestler Limited
..Respondent.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 23[rd] February, 2010.
P.C. :
1.The learned counsel on behalf of the Revenue states that the issue in appeal is covered against the Revenue by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Tata Chemicals Limited.1 In these circumstances, the appeal would not give rise to any substantial question of law in view of the statement made.
2.The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue