Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central I, Mumbai v. Purvankara Projects Limited

High Court 05 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central I, Mumbai v. Purvankara Projects Limited
Date of order
05 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central I, Mumbai v. Purvankara Projects Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3707 OF 2010 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4976 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Central I, Mumbai..Appellant. VersusPurvankara Projects Limited..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Rajeev Waglay i/by Mr.B.G. Tangsali for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 5[th] July, 2011. 1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.A. Sayed, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan