The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central-Ii, Mumbai Appellant v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Limited, Mumbai
High Court
12 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central-Ii, Mumbai Appellant v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
12 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central-Ii, Mumbai Appellant v. M/S. Parle Biscuits Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.Appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax,Central-II, MumbaiAppellant
vs.
M/s. Parle Biscuits Limited, Mumbai
Respondent
Ms. S. V. Bharucha i/b. Mr. H. D. Rathod for the appellant.
Mr. F. B. Andhyarujina i/b. Ms. R. M. Sidhwa for the respondent.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA &J. P. DEVADHAR,JJ.
P.C.:
Date :12[h] August 2004
Heard the learned counsel for the revenue.
2.It is not in dispute that the Tribunal followed the decision of thisCourt in the matter of Commissioner of Income-tax v. AntifrictionBearings Corporation Ltd., 246 ITR 295.
3.The Tribunal cannot be said to have committed any error of law.
4.No substantial question of law arises.
5.Appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R. M. LODHA, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue