The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. K. Raheja Corporation P. Limited
High Court
08 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. K. Raheja Corporation P. Limited
Date of order
08 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. K. Raheja Corporation P. Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1259 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
K. Raheja Corporation P. Limited
..Respondents.
Mr.B.M. Chatterjee for the appellant.Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate with Ms.Savita Vedpathak /by Maneksha & Sethna for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 8[th] August, 2011.
1.Counsel for the Revenue states that similar question raised in the
assessee’s own case, being Income Tax Appeal No.1260 of 2009 has been dismissed by this Court today i.e. 8[th] August 2011.
2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue