The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Videocon Application Ltd
High Court
12 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Videocon Application Ltd
Date of order
12 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Videocon Application Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Appeal is dismissed for default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.432 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-II, MumbaiVs.M/s. Videocon Application Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
....
None for the Appellant.Mr. F.V. Irani with Ms. Neeta Rajda i/b DSR Associates for theRespondent.
....
CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
12[th] August, 2008.
P.C.:
Nobody is present on behalf of the Appellant. Thematter was adjourned at the request of counsel appearing for theAppellant by order dated 29[th] July, 2008. Learned counsel has notcomplied with the directions contained in the order dated 29[th] July,2008. The Appeal is dismissed for default.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue