In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.kraftware (India) P. Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons already indicated while dismissing the companion appeal, the present appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2340 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Kraftware (India) P. Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 3[rd] February, 2010
P.C. :
1.The appeal relates to assessment year 1998-1999. The questions of law which have been formulated by the revenue are substantially the same as those in Income Tax Appeal No.1916 of 2009. For the reasons already indicated while dismissing the companion appeal, the present appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue