Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.kraftware (India) P. Limited

High Court 03 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.kraftware (India) P. Limited
Date of order
03 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.kraftware (India) P. Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeals are accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2596 OF 2009 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2597 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Kraftware (India) P. Limited ..Respondent. Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 3[rd] February, 2010 P.C. : 1.The appeals are not on board. Since the appeals in the matter of the same assessee raising the same issue have been heard and disposed of, the papers of these appeals have been taken up on the joint request of the learned counsel. The appeals have been called out for hearing. 2.On 7[th] December 2009, a conditional order was passed to the effect that the appeals shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court, if the office objections are not removed within eight weeks. The office objections do not appear to have been removed. 3.Be that as it may, we are also of the view that for the reasons already indicated while dismissing companion Income Tax Appeal No.2362 of 2009 that these appeals do not give rise to any substantial question of law. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan