The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.kraftware (India) P. Limited
High Court
03 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.kraftware (India) P. Limited
Date of order
03 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.kraftware (India) P. Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2460 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Kraftware (India) P. Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 3[rd] February, 2010
P.C. :
1.The questions of law which are formulated by the revenue are similar to those which are formulated in Income Tax Appeal No.2362 of 2009. The present appeal pertains to assessment year 2002-2003. For the reasons already furnished in the judgment of this court delivered today while dismissing Income Tax Appeal No.2362 of 2009, the present appeal does not give rise to any substantial question of law. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue