In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.kukreja Development Corporation, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.725 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-II, Mumbai ..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Kukreja Development Corporation
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.K. Shriram i/by Ajay R. Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2[nd] July, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard. The learned counsel for the revenue took us through the impugned order passed by the tribunal. The question of law sought to be raised in this appeal revolves around findings of fact recorded by the tribunal based on appreciation of evidence.
2.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this matter. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue