The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central – Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.omprakash & Company
High Court
22 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central – Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.omprakash & Company
Date of order
22 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central – Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.omprakash & Company, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1903 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1245 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Central – II, MumbaiVersusM/s.Omprakash & Company.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.P.C. Tripathi i/by Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1,Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The delay of about 668 days in filing the appeal has not been properly explained. Learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently argued that the delay cannot be condoned. Accepting the arguments advanced that the delay cannot be condoned, we endorse that no sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, the notice of motion for condonation of delay is rejected.
2.Appeal papers be consigned to the record department.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue