Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.tips Cassettes & Records Company

High Court 04 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.tips Cassettes & Records Company
Date of order
04 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.tips Cassettes & Records Company, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1139 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Tips Cassettes & Records Company ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by A.L. Gore for the appellant.Mr.Deepak T i/by Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the judgment of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact after appreciation of material available on record. In that view of the matter, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal holding it to be without any substantial question of law. 2.The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan