Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.unique Estate Development Company Limited

High Court 03 Apr 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.unique Estate Development Company Limited
Date of order
03 Apr 2013
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – Ii, Mumbai v. M/S.unique Estate Development Company Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.58 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Unique Estate Development Company Limited..Respondent. Mr.A.R. Malhotra with Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.Sanjay Sawant for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 3[rd] April 2013 P.C. : 1.In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2006-07, following question of law has been proposed for our consideration. “Whether, on the facts facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right, in holding that income from sale of flats under consideration was not chargeable to tax even though the entire sale proceeds including possession money was received during the year, merely because the physical possessioni was handed over subsequently by following its earlier orders in the same case for assessment years 1999-2000, 2001-02 and 2002-03 ?” 2.Counsel for the parties are agreed that the issue arising herein is covered in favour of the respondent – assessee and against the Revenue by the decision of this Court dated 28[th] January 2013 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1516 of 2012 filed by the Revenue in respect of the same respondent – assessee. In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan