The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii v. M/S.cmc Computers Ltd
High Court
18 Jan 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii v. M/S.cmc Computers Ltd
Date of order
18 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii v. M/S.cmc Computers Ltd, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.123 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II.
... Appellant.
Vs.M/s.CMC Computers Ltd....Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
18[th] January, 2010.
P.C.:
The appeal was admitted on the following substantial
questions of law :
“(a) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble ITAT was right in law in holding that the omission of the second proviso to section 43B is deemed to have retrospective effect?
-(b) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble ITAT was right in law in holding that payments in respect of employer’s contribution to PF, made belatedly, beyond the time and grace period under that statute be allowed u/s.43B?”
Both the questions are covered against the Revenue by
the judgment of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income
Taxvs.Alom Extrusions Ltd., (2009) 319 ITR 306. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue has also made a statement to that effect. In the circumstances, the questions of law shall stand answered in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court. The appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.