The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.excel Industries Limited
High Court
25 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.excel Industries Limited
Date of order
25 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.excel Industries Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.143 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central III, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.Excel Industries Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.Percy J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate with Ms.Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 25[th] November 2011
P.C. :
1.Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by the Revenue in the assessee’s own case, being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1183 of 2011 has been dismissed by us today i.e. 25[th] November 2011.
2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue