Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii, Mumbai v. Shri Mahendra Kumar Mansinghka

High Court 27 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii, Mumbai v. Shri Mahendra Kumar Mansinghka
Date of order
27 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii, Mumbai v. Shri Mahendra Kumar Mansinghka, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, thus, dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.864 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central III, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Shri Mahendra Kumar Mansinghka ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 27TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard. All questions raised in this appeal are based on appreciation of evidence and the same cannot be said to be a questions of law unless it is demonstrated that the evidence which is not on record has been considered or the evidence which is on record is perversly appreciated. None of these grounds are to be found in this appeal. 2.In this view of the matter, no substantial questions of law involved in this appeal. The appeal is, thus, dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan