In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Central Iii v. Excel Industries Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.629 OF 2011INREVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.172 OF 2010IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1541 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – Central IIIversusExcel Industries Ltd.
.....
None present for the parties.
.....
..Review Petitioner.
..Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANDJ.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
7 February 2013.
P.C. :
The Review Petitioner and his advocate are absent. The Notice of Motion is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.