The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii v. M/S Narang Enterprises
High Court
17 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii v. M/S Narang Enterprises
Date of order
17 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii v. M/S Narang Enterprises, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III
).. Appellant
Versus
M/s Narang Enterprises
).. Respondent
Mr Suresh Kumar i/b P Kapoor for the Appellant.
CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J.&A. P. DESHPANDE, J.DATED: 17TH SEPTEMBER 2008.
P.C.
We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the
Appellant. The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant states thatthe Department has not appealled against the order for the previousyear, may not be bar for another year. That principle, per se, may notbe disputable, but the Surpeme Court has in uncertain terms said thatthere has to be a just cause or a public interest involved. Neither ofthese two circumstances exist in the present case. It is not disputedthat the order for the previous assessment year has attained finality. Nosteps had been taken by the Department to appeal against the saidorder nor any justification given for non-preference of an Appeal. In the
circumstances, no question of law arises. Dismissed. No order as tocosts.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.