Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii v. M/S Narang Enterprises

High Court 17 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii v. M/S Narang Enterprises
Date of order
17 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii v. M/S Narang Enterprises, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III ).. Appellant Versus M/s Narang Enterprises ).. Respondent Mr Suresh Kumar i/b P Kapoor for the Appellant. CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J.&A. P. DESHPANDE, J.DATED: 17TH SEPTEMBER 2008. P.C. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant. The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant states thatthe Department has not appealled against the order for the previousyear, may not be bar for another year. That principle, per se, may notbe disputable, but the Surpeme Court has in uncertain terms said thatthere has to be a just cause or a public interest involved. Neither ofthese two circumstances exist in the present case. It is not disputedthat the order for the previous assessment year has attained finality. Nosteps had been taken by the Department to appeal against the saidorder nor any justification given for non-preference of an Appeal. In the circumstances, no question of law arises. Dismissed. No order as tocosts. CHIEF JUSTICE A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan