Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Central Iii v. M/S. Usv Ltd

High Court 02 Feb 2012 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

02 Feb 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Central Iii v. M/S. Usv Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

snc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3769 OF 2011 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 362 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax- Central III ...Appellant Versus M/s. USV Ltd. ...Respondent ---- Mr.Suresh Kumar for Appellant. None for Respondent. CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 02 FEBRUARY 2012. P.C. The Appeal was dismissed for non removal of office objections on 03 March 2009 pursuant to a conditional order of the Prothonotary and Senior Master. The applicant was absent, when the Prothonotary passed that order and it has been stated that the applicant was unaware of the order. It has been stated that it was only, while preparing for a subsequent case, that the department obtained knowledge of the dismissal. An affidavit of service has been filed. The Respondent has neither appeared, nor raised any objection to the restoration of the Appeal. Sufficient cause has been shown. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Time for the removing office objection is extended by a period of four weeks from today. (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.