The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii v. M/S. Varun Industries Ltd
High Court
25 Feb 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii v. M/S. Varun Industries Ltd
Date of order
25 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii v. M/S. Varun Industries Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1967 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central III
v.M/s. Varun Industries Ltd.
...Appellant.
...Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Respondent.Mr.S.P.Mehta for the Respsondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 25[th] February, 2013.
P.C. :
In this appeal by the revenue following question has been
raised for our consideration.
a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in deleting the entire addition made on account of bogus purchases when the assessee could not produce any evidence to prove the genuineness of the purchase parties?
2)Counsel for the parties state that the similar question was
raised by the revenue before this Court in respect of the same
respondent assessee being ITXA No.90/2011. This Court by its order
dated 21/6/2012 did not entertain the appeal being ITXA No.90/2011
on an identical question as framed herein. For the reasons mentioned in order dated 21/6/2012 in ITXA No.90/2011, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to
costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.