The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Central Iii v. M/S.glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited
High Court
29 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Central Iii v. M/S.glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited
Date of order
29 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Central Iii v. M/S.glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.667 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – Central III
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 29TH JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question sought to be raised in this appeal revolves around appreciation of evidence, based on which finding of fact is recorded by the tribunal, with which no fault can be found.
2.We do not find any substantial question of law involved in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue