The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – Iv, Mumbai v. Mr.ketan V. Parekh
High Court
13 Aug 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – Iv, Mumbai v. Mr.ketan V. Parekh
Date of order
13 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – Iv, Mumbai v. Mr.ketan V. Parekh, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3076 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2640 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – IV, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Mr.Ketan V. Parekh
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan with Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud &
J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 13 August 2010.
P.C. :
1.Perused affidavit in support. The Notice of Motion is for setting aside the dismissal of the appeal for non-removal of office objections. Sufficient cause has been shown. Subject to payment of cost quantified at Rs.1,500/- to the Respondent, within a period of four weeks from today, the appeal is restored to file.
2.The notice is motion is accordingly disposed. There shall be no order as to costs. The office objections are dispensed with.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue