Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.classic Credit Limited

High Court 06 Jul 2010 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

06 Jul 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.classic Credit Limited, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1360 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1589 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central IV, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Classic Credit Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr.Debashish Mitra i/by Legal Assistance for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 6 July, 2010. P.C. : 1.The chamber summons has been taken out to bring the Official Liquidator, High Court, Calcutta on the record. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant has sought leave to amend the Chamber Summons to delete the name of the Official Liquidator and to bring the Official Liquidator in his official capacity on record. Leave to amend is granted. Amendment to be carried out during the course of day. There is no reason as to why the chamber summons should not be allowed. 2.The chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment in pursuance of the order allowing the chamber summons shall be carried out within a period of one week from today. Verification is dispensed with. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.