Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.triumph Securities Limited

High Court 05 Feb 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.triumph Securities Limited
Date of order
05 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.triumph Securities Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1706 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central IV, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Triumph Securities Limited..Respondent. Mr.Arvind Pinto i/by Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.Atul K Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 5[th] February 2013 P.C. : 1.In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2004-2005, following question of law has been formulated for our consideration. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in allowing deduction as bad debts under Section 36 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the assessee, who is a share brokers in respect of the amount which could not be recovered from its clients with regard to transactions effected by the assessee on behalf of his client ?” 2.Counsel for the parties state that the issue arising in this appeal is covered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Shreyas S. Morakhia reported in (2012) 342 ITR 285 (Bom). In view of the above, we do not entertain the question as formulated. 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan