The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. Solar Packaging Private Limited
High Court
08 Dec 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. Solar Packaging Private Limited
Date of order
08 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv, Mumbai v. Solar Packaging Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6993 OF 2010
ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6994 OF 2010ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6998 OF 2010AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.7001 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central IV, Mumbai
Versus
Solar Packaging Private Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Tejveer Singh with Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 8[th] December 2011
1.Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the questions raised in these appeals are squarely covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of UCO Bank V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 237 ITR 889. Moreover, similar questions raised by the Revenue in the assessee’s own case, being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1292 of 2005 has been dismissed by this Court on 10[th] November 2009.
2.In this view of the matter, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue