The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv v. Roha Dyechem Pvt. Ltd
High Court
09 Jun 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv v. Roha Dyechem Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
09 Jun 2015
Assessment year(s)
2003-04, 2001-02
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iv v. Roha Dyechem Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
bsb 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1442 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central IV
… Appellant
v/s
Roha DyeChem Pvt. Ltd.
… Respondent
Mr.Arvind Pinto for the appellant.
None present for the respondent.
CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA & N. M. JAMDAR, JJ.
DATED : 9TH JUNE, 2015
P.C.:
This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenges the order dated 31 January 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai. The impugned order relates to the Assessment Year 2003-04.
2The appellant has formulated the following question of law for our consideration :-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law to direct the Assessing Officer to recompute the quantum of deduction under
bsb 2
Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act without deducting the deduction under Section 80IB of the Act while ignoring the clear provisions of Section 80IB (9) of the Act.”
3By the impugned order the Tribunal has allowed the respondent assessee's appeal by following the decision of this Court in Associate Capsules Pvt. Ltd. v/s Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, reported in 333 I.T.R. 42 (Bom.). The impugned order also relies upon the fact that in the respondent assessee's own case for the assessment year 2001-02 it had by an order dated 20 May 2011 on identical issue, allowed respondent assessee's appeal by following the decision of this court in Associate Capsules Pvt. Ltd. (supra). The Revenue has not pointed out any distinguishing features in the present case warranting a view different from that taken by this Court in Associate Capsules Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and in the assessee's own case.
4In the circumstances, no fault can be found with the impugned order of the Tribunal in having followed the decision of the jurisdictional Court. Accordingly, no substantial question of law arises. Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
( N. M. JAMDAR, J. ) ( M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.