Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Oswal Woolen Mills, Sherpur, Ludhiana

High Court 27 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

27 Jan 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Oswal Woolen Mills, Sherpur, Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No. 87 of 2001 (O&M )DATE OF DECISION : 27.01.2016 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana _.. APPELLANT Versus M/s Oswal Woolen Mills, Sherpur, Ludhiana —.. RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present :Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate,for the appellant. Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate, with|Mr. Parvesh K. Saini, Advocate,for the respondent. "SRO SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.( Oral ) Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions from theDepartment, states that in view of Circular No. 21/2015 issued by theGovernment of India vide letter dated 10.12.2015, the appellant departmentdoes want to pursue this appeal. Dismissed as not pressed. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL )JUDGE January 27, 2016 ( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU )JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.