The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Nagpur v. Mahesh Gupta, Nagpur
High Court
09 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Nagpur v. Mahesh Gupta, Nagpur
Date of order
09 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Nagpur v. Mahesh Gupta, Nagpur, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of this order and for the reasons recorded therein, as no substantial question of law arise, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
INCOMT TAX APPEAL NO. 100/2013.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Nagpur.
VERSUS Mahesh Gupta, Nagpur.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARIAND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 09, 2015.
Heard Shri Anand Parchure, learned Counsel for the appellant. He submits that against very same assessee, appeal raising same questions have been disposed of on 10.10.2013. Copy of the said order dated 10.10.2013 in Income Tax Appeal No. 9/2013 is produced by him before us, the same is taken on record and marked as “Exh.X” for identification.
In view of this order and for the reasons recorded therein, as no substantial question of law arise, this appeal is dismissed. No costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Rgd
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue