Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. M/S Mulay Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad

High Court 17 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. M/S Mulay Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.27 OF 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), NAGPURVERSUSM/S MULAY CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AURANGABAD... ... Mr.Alok Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel for Appellant. Mr.S.R. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent. ... CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 17[th] FEBRUARY, 2021 ORDER : 1.Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant tendersacross a copy of letter dated 01-02-2021 which is marked ‘X’ foridentification, referring to that the Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax has given instructions to withdraw the matterpursuant to CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8[th] August, 2019. 2.In view of aforesaid, learned counsel for appellant seeksleave to withdraw and accordingly the Income Tax Appeal isdisposed of as withdrawn. Refund the court fees as per rules. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]asb/FEB21

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.