Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. M/S Mulay Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad

High Court 17 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. M/S Mulay Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.30 OF 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), NAGPURVERSUSM/S MULAY CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AURANGABAD... ... Mr.Alok Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel for Appellant. Mr.S.R. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent. ... CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 17[th] FEBRUARY, 2021 ORDER : 1.Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant tendersacross a copy of letter dated 01-02-2021 which is marked ‘X’ foridentification, referring to that the Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax has given instructions to withdraw the matterpursuant to CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8[th] August, 2019. 2.In view of aforesaid, learned counsel for appellant seeksleave to withdraw and accordingly the Income Tax Appeal isdisposed of as withdrawn. Refund the court fees as per rules. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]asb/FEB21

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.