The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Motilal P. Khinvasara (Huf), Pune
High Court
08 Aug 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Motilal P. Khinvasara (Huf), Pune
Date of order
08 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pune v. Motilal P. Khinvasara (Huf), Pune, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1271 OF 2011
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6576 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Pune
Versus
Motilal P. Khinvasara (HUF), Pune
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 8[th] August, 2011.
1.Counsel for the Revenue states that this Notice of Motion has been served on the respondent on 6[th] August 2011. He undertakes to file affidavit of service within two days from today. None appears for the respondent, though served.
2.For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (A), (A-1) and (B).
3.Appellant to remove office objections within two weeks from today.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue