Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central)...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central),Nagpur v. Shri Pralhad Hariram Panhale

High Court 02 Nov 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

02 Nov 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central),Nagpur v. Shri Pralhad Hariram Panhale, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawnand disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.87 OF 2015 The Commissioner of Income-tax (Central),Nagpur ..APPELLANT VERSUS Shri Pralhad Hariram Panhale ..RESPONDENT Mr Alok Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel for appellant CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALEAND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 2nd November, 2018 ORAL ORDER: Mr Sharma, learned Sr. Standing Counsel appearing on behalfappellant invited our attention to the communication dated 29[th]October, 2018 forwarded to him by Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Central Circle-1, Aurangabad, copy of which is placedon record and marked 'X' for identification. 2.In view of the aforesaid communication, learned Counsel praysfor withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawnand disposed of. (SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) amj (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.