The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh v. M/S Chandigarh Industrial Tourism Development Corporation Limited
High Court
29 Sep 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh v. M/S Chandigarh Industrial Tourism Development Corporation Limited
Date of order
29 Sep 2010
Assessment year(s)
1991-92
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh v. M/S Chandigarh Industrial Tourism Development Corporation Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
ITA No. 243 of 2003
Date of decision: 29.9.2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh
-----Appellant
Vs.
M/s Chandigarh Industrial Tourism Development Corporation Limited
----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present:-Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the revenue.Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocate for the respondent.
Adarsh Kumar Goel,J.
This order will dispose of ITA Nos.243 of 2003 and 387 of2004 as learned counsel for the parties agree that both the appealsinvolve common question.
In ITA No.243 of 2003, appeal of the revenue is undersection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) againstorder of the Income Tax Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench ‘B’ Chandigarhdated 21.4.2003 in ITA No.744/Chandi/97 for the assessment year1991-92, raising following substantial question of law:-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the ITAT was right in law in allowing the income ofthe assessee to be taxed on receipt basis and not onaccrual basis even though the assessee was followingmercantile system of accounting?”
Learned counsel for the parties further agree that the saidquestion is covered against the revenue by judgment of this Court in
CIT v. Chandigarh Industrial and General Development Corporation
Limited, (2009) 319 ITR 85.
Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.
(Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge
September 29, 2010‘gs’
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.