The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai-Iv v. M/S. R.k.swamy Bbdo Advertising Pvt Ltd
High Court
29 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai-Iv v. M/S. R.k.swamy Bbdo Advertising Pvt Ltd
Date of order
29 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai-Iv v. M/S. R.k.swamy Bbdo Advertising Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai-IV, 121, Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai – 600 034....Appellant/Appellant
Vs...Respondent/Respondent
M/s. R.K.Swamy BBDOAdvertising Pvt Ltd.,604, Mount Road,Chennai – 600 006.
Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 isdirected against the order dated 26.07.2012 in ITANo.434/Mds/2011 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate TribunalMadras 'A' Bench for the assessment year 2007-08, against theorder of The Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) V, Chennai-34,dated 01.12.2010, made in ITA No.367/09-10, and against theorder of The Assistant Commissioner of Income Ta, Company circleV(4), Chennai, dated 22.12.2009, made in PAN No. ,Assessment year 2007-08.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learnedcounsel for the respondent.
2. This appeal by the Revenue is challenged against theorder passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw this appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event, the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue tomake a mention to this Court to restore the appeals to be heardand decided on merits.
Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CO)//True copy//Sub Assistant RegistrarmrmTo1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai IV,121 Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai-343. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) V, Chennai-34.4. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle V(4) Chennai.+1cc to Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate SR.No.74761
+1cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate SR.No.73719
BR(CO)GMY(04/12/2018)
TCA No. 159 of 2013
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.