The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Dr.vamsic Mohan
High Court
28 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Dr.vamsic Mohan
Date of order
28 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Dr.vamsic Mohan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is less than themonetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal is dismissed asnot pressed, preserving the substantial questions of law fordetermination in an appropriate case. s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) True Copy ssk.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.11.2018
Tax Case Appeal No.323 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai. ..Appellant/Respondent Vs.
Dr.Vamsic Mohan..Respondent/Appellant
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 8.7.2008 made in IT(SS) No.41/Mds/2007 against the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)XII, Chennai 34 in I.T.A. No. 323/05-06 dated12.10.2006 in G.I. No./PA No.AAAPV6188N.For Appellant : Ms.Premalatha for Mr.M.Swaminathan
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated8.7.2008 made in IT (SS) No.41/Mds/2007, by raising thefollowing substantial questions of law:
"(i) Whether, on the facts and circumstances ofthe case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal wasright in holding that the block assessment made wasillegal and beyond the jurisdiction since the noticeissued under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act,was given after the expiry of twelve months periodfrom the end of the month in which the block returnwas filed?
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
(ii) Whether the assessment made is bad as it isonly methodology or procedural requirementsmentioned in section 158BC(6) of the Act, which areapplied to search cases and also in the light ofsection 292B of the Act?"
2. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instructionissued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide CircularNo.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 wherein it is stipulated that appealsshall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the HighCourt in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs.
3. In the instant case, the tax effect is less than themonetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal is dismissed asnot pressed, preserving the substantial questions of law fordetermination in an appropriate case.
s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
True Copy
ssk.
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “A” Bench, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)XII
Chennai 34.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle XV, Chennai 34.
+1 CC to Mrs.S. Premalatha, Advocate sr 81249.
+1 CC to Mr.V.B. Jayakumar, Advocate sr 81598.
TCA No.323 of 2009
RJI(CO)SP(04/01/2019)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.