Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Karandhai Tamil Sangam

High Court 31 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Karandhai Tamil Sangam
Date of order
31 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Karandhai Tamil Sangam, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATE: 31.03.2021 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMYAND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI T.C.A.No.289 of 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai. .. Appellant/PetitionerVs. Karandhai Tamil Sangam,1922, Seshaiya Sasthriyar Road,Karuthattangudi,Thanjavur... Respondent/Respondent Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras, "B" Bench, dated 24.08.2012 in M.P.No.120/Mds/2012 inI.TA.No.960/Mds/2011 for the assessment year 2010-11 and againstthe order of the Commissioner of Income Tax-II(i/c), No.4,Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001 made inC.No.7162E(52)/2010-11/CIT-II/TRY, dated 29.04.2011. For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy, Senior Standing CounselFor Respondent : No appearance JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.) Challenging the order passed in M.P.No.120/Mds/2012 inI.TA.No.960/Mds/2011 in respect of the assessment year 2010-11on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, "B"Bench, the Revenue has filed the above appeal. 2.It is pertinent to note that the above appeal has beenfiled by the Revenue as against the order passed in theMiscellaneousPetitioninM.P.No.120/Mds/2012inI.TA.No.960/Mds/2011. The Revenue has also filed an appeal inT.C.A.No.916 of 2013 as against the order passed in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ I.TA.No.960/Mds/2011. It is needless to say that the orderpassed in the Miscellaneous Petition in M.P.No.120/Mds/2012merges with the order passed in I.TA.No.960/Mds/2011. 3.In these circumstances, Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned seniorstanding counsel appearing for the appellant – Revenue submittedthat the appeal in T.C.A.No.289 of 2013 may be disposed ofgiving liberty to the appellant – Revenue to canvass all theissues that are raised in the appeal in T.C.A.No.289 of 2013 inT.C.A.No.916 of 2013. 3.Recording the submissions made by Mr.J.Narayanasamy,learned senior standing counsel for the appellant – Revenue,T.C.A.No.289 of 2013 is disposed of. It is open to the appellantto canvass all the issued that were raised in T.C.A.No.289 of2013 in T.C.A.No.916 of 2013. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) vaTo //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, "B" Bench. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax-II(i/c), No.4, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli. T.C.A.No.289 of 2013 SR-II(CO)CSR 28.04.2021
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan