The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Mr.b.mohandoss
High Court
22 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Mr.b.mohandoss
Date of order
22 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. Mr.b.mohandoss, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai...AppellantVsMr.B.Mohandoss...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 20.11.2008 in ITA No.989/Mds/2007on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai'A' Bench for the assessment year 2000-01 and against theorder of the commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)xi,Chennai 34.dt.22/12/06 made in ITA.22/06-07 and against theorder of the Income tax officer Ward 1(3), Tambaram,Chennai 45 dt.31/03/2006 made in PAN/GIR NO. /13-7130 Assessment year 2000-01.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik RanganathanFor Respondent :Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee. 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on accountof low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn and the substantial questions of law framedare left open. In the event the tax effect is above thethreshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. Nocosts.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS ix)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The commissioner of Income Tax , Chennai
2.The commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)xi, Chennai 34.
3.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench.
4.The Income Tax officer,Ward 1(3),Tambaram, Chennai 45.
+1cc to Mr.Karthik Ranganathan , Advocate SR.No. 72638
+1cc to M/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan , Advocate SR.No.71635
TCA.No.619 of 2009
ASK(20/11/2018)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.