Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S. Arun Excello Urban Infrastructure Pvt Ltdbhattad Towers18, West Cott Roadroyapettah, Chennai 600 010Pan: Aagca2312Q

High Court 16 Sep 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S. Arun Excello Urban Infrastructure Pvt Ltdbhattad Towers18, West Cott Roadroyapettah, Chennai 600 010Pan: Aagca2312Q
Date of order
16 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S. Arun Excello Urban Infrastructure Pvt Ltdbhattad Towers18, West Cott Roadroyapettah, Chennai 600 010Pan: Aagca2312Q, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.09.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN TCA No.196 of 2022 The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai...Appellant Vs. M/s. Arun Excello Urban Infrastructure Pvt LtdBhattad Towers18, West Cott RoadRoyapettah, Chennai 600 010PAN: AAGCA2312Q..Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 30.11.2021 passed in ITA No.731/CHNY/2020 on the file of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai. For Appellant :Mr.T.RavikumarSenior Standing Counsel For Respondent:M/s. Vandhana VyasJUDGMENT ____________ Page 1 of 4 (Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the questions of law may be kept open for consideration in the appropriate matter. 3. In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 16.09.2025 kpl ____________ Page 2 of 4 To 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal'D' Bench, Chennai. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal'D' Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai. Chennai. ____________ Page 3 of 4 ____________ Page 4 of 4 TCA No.196 of 2022 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) TCA No.196 of 2022 16.09.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan