The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.adarsh Marine Enterprises Private Ltd
High Court
22 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.adarsh Marine Enterprises Private Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.adarsh Marine Enterprises Private Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.1.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.417 of 2013
The Commissioner of Income TaxChennai. ... AppellantVersus
M/s.Adarsh Marine Enterprises Private Ltd.,No.2, Nagalingam Street,Sivagami Nagar,Gowriwakkam,Chennai 600 073. ... Respondent
Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench, Chennaidated 08.11.2012, in I.T.A.No.1093/Mds/2012 against the Order ofthe Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - III, Chennai dated06.02.2012 and made in ITA.No.183/09-10/A-III against the Orderof the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle 1(1),Chennai dated 30.10.2009 and made in PA/GIR.No.AAFCA6734K forthe Assessment Year 2007 - 2008.
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdrawthe present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
lanTo:
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
1.The Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench, Chennai
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) - III, Chennai. (Appeals) - III, Chennai.
3.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle 1(1), Chennai. Company Circle 1(1), Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.T.Ravikumar, Advocate, S.R.No.4699+1cc to Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.3921+1cc to Mr.R.Senniappan, Advocate, S.R.No.3869
SV(CO)CA(04/02/2016)
Tax Case Appeal No.417 of 2013
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.