The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.altos Advisory Services Limited29
High Court
01 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.altos Advisory Services Limited29
Date of order
01 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.altos Advisory Services Limited29, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sriraman ----- J U D G M E N T(Delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, by raising t...
Decision: Recording the said submission, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication at appropriate stage.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMARANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Tax Case Appeal No.1152 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Altos Advisory Services Limited29/20, Karpagambal Nagar, II FloorMylapore, Chennai 600 004.
...Respondent
-----
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 05.06.2012 made in ITA No.1091/Mds/2011.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sriraman
-----
J U D G M E N T(Delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question
the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, by raising the following substantial questions of law:
"(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the disallowance made u/s.40(a)(ia) in respect of failure to deduct TDS on consultancy charges for the AY 2005-06 is not proper?
(ii) Is not the finding of the Tribunal bad since the word 'payavle' includes the word 'paid' for the purpose of Sec.40(a)(ia)?"
2. It is brought to our notice by the learned Standing Counsel for the
appellant Revenue that in the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue can be disposed of, keeping the substantial questions of law raised in this appeal open for adjudication at a later point of time.
3. Recording the said submission, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication at appropriate stage. No costs.
NCS : Yes/NoIndex : Yes/NoKST
(R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 01.10.2024
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal'D' Bench, Chennai.
T.C.A.No.1152 of 2015
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN, J.
KST
T.C.A.No.1152 of 2015
01.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.