Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.armour Consultants (P) Ltd.,Chennai-18

High Court 22 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.armour Consultants (P) Ltd.,Chennai-18
Date of order
22 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.armour Consultants (P) Ltd.,Chennai-18, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal No.114 of 2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Vs ...Appellant M/s.Armour Consultants (P) Ltd.,Chennai-18...Respondent Appeal against the Order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench, Chennai, Dated 11.09.2013 passed in ITA.1315/MDS/2013 Assessment Year 2007-08 against the Order of theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dated 09.01.2013 PANAADCA2759C. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar & Mrs.R.HemalathaFor Respondent : No appearance Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee. 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limit https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ fixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue tomake a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heardand decided on merits. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) VI, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-34.3. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle (1), Chennai-34.+1cc to Mr.T.Ravi Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No. 72213TCA.No.114 of 2014RGN(CO)GN(19/11/2018)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan