The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.bimetal Bearings Ltd., Chennai-11
High Court
10 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.bimetal Bearings Ltd., Chennai-11
Date of order
10 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.bimetal Bearings Ltd., Chennai-11, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 10.10.2018
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAMand The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Tax Case Appeal Nos.10 & 11 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai...AppellantVs
M/s.Bimetal Bearings Ltd., Chennai-11....Respondent
APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the common order dated 22.5.2015 in ITA Nos.89 and90/Mds/2015 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate TribunalMadras 'C' Bench respectively for the assessment years 2005-06and 2006-07. preferred against Order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) – 1, Chennai dated 25/09/2014 and itemanates from the Order dated 28/11/2007 passed by the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax, Company 1(2), Chennai the AssessingOfficer.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar, SSC
For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan
COMMON JUDGMENT(Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J)
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. These appeals by the Revenue challenge the common orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided theissue in favour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeals on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event, in each of the cases, the tax effect isabove the threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.
3. The Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals)-1, Chennai. (Appeals)-1, Chennai.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Income, Company Circe (1(2)), Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.T.Ravi Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No. 69912+1cc to Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar, Advocate, S.R.No. 70763
PP(CO)GN(26/11/2018)
TCA.Nos.10 & 11 of 2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.