The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.chemise Indus P. Ltd.chennai-77
High Court
02 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.chemise Indus P. Ltd.chennai-77
Date of order
02 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.chemise Indus P. Ltd.chennai-77, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether, on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal wasright in deleting the addition made underSection 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act? ii.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.1.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
TAX CASE APPEAL NO.43 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai
...Appellant
Vs
M/s.Chemise Indus P. Ltd.Chennai-77...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 27.6.2014 in ITA No.630/Mds/2014 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'A' Bench forthe assessment year 2003-04.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar, SSC
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee. The appeal was admitted on 25.1.2016 onthe following substantial questions of law :
“i. Whether, on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal wasright in deleting the addition made underSection 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act?
ii. Whether, on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal wasright in holding that the deemed dividendunder Section 2(22)(e) arises in the handsof Smt.Radha Daga and not in the hands ofthe assessee M/s.Chemise Indus PrivateLimited ?”
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw this appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular under exceptional clauses mentionedin the circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make amention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard anddecided on merits.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar//True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarRsTo1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.3.The Section Officer,VR Section, High Court, Madras-104 (2 Copies)+1cc to M/S.R.Hemalatha, Senior Standing Counsel, S.R.No.286TCA.No.43 of 2016
SPD(CO)CS/04/03/2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.