Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.indo Asian Finance Limited, Chennai-17

High Court 08 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.indo Asian Finance Limited, Chennai-17
Date of order
08 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.indo Asian Finance Limited, Chennai-17, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is leftopen.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai...Appellant/RespondentVsM/s.Indo Asian Finance Limited,Chennai-17....Respondent/Appellant APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the common order dated 17.1.2013 in ITA Nos.1150 to1154/Mds/2008 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate TribunalChennai 'A' Bench respectively for the assessment years from1999-2000 to 2003-04 against the common order dated 29.12.2006in PAN GIR No.AAACI21170 for the assessment year 1999-2000,15/02/2008 in PAN No.AAACI21170 on the file of the Commissionerof Income Tax (Appeals)XII, chennai year 1999-2000 to 2002-2003and the order dated 31/01/2008 for the assessment year 2003-2004on the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) VIII,Chennai which were filed against the order dated dated22/08/2009, 22/08/2007 and 28/03/2006 in GI No/PAN No/AAACI21170for the Assessment years 2000-01 to 2003-2004 by the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle II (3) Chennai. 2. These appeals by the Revenue challenge the common orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided theissue in favour of the assessee. 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeals on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 4. In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is leftopen. In the event, in each of the cases, the tax effect isabove the threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True copy//Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'A' Bench.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) VIII, Chennai.3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) XII, Chennai.4. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Range-II(3), Chennai.+1cc to Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, Advocate SR.No.69519TCA.Nos.641 to 645of 2013 SJ(CO)GMY(30/10/2018)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan