Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.m.f.tools & Engg. Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-42

High Court 17 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.m.f.tools & Engg. Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-42
Date of order
17 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.m.f.tools & Engg. Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-42, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, the tax case appeals are dismissed in view of the above circular.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 17.2.2016 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice N.KIRUBAKARAN Tax Case Appeal Nos.1445 to 1447 of 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai....AppellantVs M/s.M.F.Tools & Engg. Pvt. Ltd.,Chennai-42....Respondent APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the common order dated 4.4.2007 made in I.T.A.Nos.2689, 2690 and 2691/Mds/ 05 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai for the assessment years 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03. For Appellant : Mr.A.P.Srinivas for Mr.T.R.SenthilkumarFor Respondent : Mr.N.Quadir Hoseyn COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J) These appeals are by the Commissioner of Income Tax. 2. We have heard Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.N.Quadir Hoseyn, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. The tax implication is below the ceiling limit stipulated in the circular in Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 4. Therefore, the tax case appeals are dismissed in view of the above circular. The questions of law are left open to be decided. No costs. Internet : Yes 17.2.2016 ToThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai TCA.Nos.1445 to 1447/2007
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan