The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.rr Donnelley India Outsource Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-28
High Court
02 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.rr Donnelley India Outsource Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-28
Date of order
02 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.rr Donnelley India Outsource Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-28, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR
Tax Case Appeal No.791 of 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai
...Appellant/AppellantVs
M/s.RR Donnelley India OutsourcePvt. Ltd., Chennai-28...Respondent/Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 20.6.2013 in ITA No.2222/Mds/2012 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'D' Bench forthe assessment year 2008-09. Preferred against the order passedby the Income Tax Officer, Company Circle V(4) Chennai-34, dated28.09.2012 for the Assessment year 2008-09.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar, SSC For Respondent :Mr.N.Muthukumar
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee. The appeal was admitted on 08.4.2014 onthe following substantial question of law :
“Whether, under the facts and circumstancesof the case, the Income Tax AppellateTribunal was right in holding that the lossof other units are to be set off only aftergrant of deduction under Section 10A?”
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw this appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular under exceptional clauses mentionedin the circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make amention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard anddecided on merits. No costs.
Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CCC)//True copy//Sub Assistant RegistrarRsTo1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.4. The Income Tax Officer, Company circle V(4), Chennai.-34.+1cc to Mr.R.Hemalatha, Advocate SR.No.282TCA.No.791 of 2013BS(CO)GMY(13/02/2019)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.