The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.scientific Publishing Services Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-4
High Court
24 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.scientific Publishing Services Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-4
Date of order
24 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.scientific Publishing Services Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-4, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Tax Case Appeal No.725 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai...AppellantVsM/s.Scientific Publishing ServicesPvt. Ltd., Chennai-4...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 19.1.2015 in ITA No.2489/Mds/2014on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai'C' Bench for the assessment year 2009-10 against thecommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VI, Chennai.600034,DT.30.06.2014 in ITA NO.1531/13-14/A-VI for theAssessment Year 2009-2010 and against the Assessment orderof the Deputy commissioner of Income Tax ,company Circle VI(1), Chennai. 600034,Dt.26.03.2013 in GIR NO/PAN : for the Assessment year 2009-2010.
For Appellant :Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar & Mrs.K.G.UsharaniFor Respondent:Mr.R.Venkatanarayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on accountof low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn and the substantial questions of law framedare left open. In the event the tax effect is above thethreshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. Nocosts.
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.