The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.sindhi Educational Society (Madras), Chennai-8
High Court
02 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.sindhi Educational Society (Madras), Chennai-8
Date of order
02 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.sindhi Educational Society (Madras), Chennai-8, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 02.1.2019
Coram :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Tax Case Appeal No.524 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai ...Appellant/Appellant VsM/s.Sindhi Educational Society(Madras), Chennai-8....Respondent/Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 15.5.2015 in ITA No.981/Mds/2014 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'D' Bench forthe assessment year 2010-11 and against the order of theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)III, Chennai dated03.03.2014 in I.T.A. No. 167/2012-2013 and against the order ofthe Assistant Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) IV, Chennaidated 05.02.2012 in PA/GIR No. AABTSO129B.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy, SSCFor Respondent :Mr.V.S.Jayakumar
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,JHeard the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee. The appeal was admitted on 27.7.2016 onthe following substantial question of law :
“Whether, on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal wasright in holding that the assessee isentitled to claim depreciation on the assetseven though the cost of purchase of assetwas already treated as application of incomeunder Section 11 of the Income Tax Act ?”
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw this appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular under exceptional clauses mentionedin the circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make amention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard anddecided on merits. No costs.
s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) True Copy Sub-Assistant RegistrarTo1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)VII, Chennai.3. The Assistant Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)IV, Chennai.+1 CC to Mr.J.Narayanasamy, Advocate sr 150.+1 CC to Mr.V.S.Jayakumar, Advocate sr 232.TCA.No.524 of 2016KK(CO)SP(07/02/2019)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.