Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.sivagami Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-2

High Court 22 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.sivagami Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-2
Date of order
22 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.sivagami Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-2, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai...AppellantVs M/s.Sivagami Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-2...Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 27.11.2015 in ITA No.1121/Mds/2015on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai'B' Bench for the assessment year 2010-11 Appeal filedagainst the order of the Principal commissioner of IncomeTax -6,Nungambakkam, Chennai made in CMO.6119(6) CIT-6/13-14 dt 04.03.2015 for the Assessment year 2010-2011 againstthe assessment order dated 25.03.2013 for the assessmentyear 2010-2011. For Appellant :Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar & Ms.K.G.UsharaniFor Respondent :Mr.A.S.Sriraman Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee. 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on accountof low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn and the substantial questions of law raisedare left open. In the event the tax effect is above thethreshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. Nocosts. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS ix) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'B' Bench. 2.The Principal commissioner of Income Tax -6,Nungambakkam, Chennai . +2ccs to Mr.T.Ravi kumar , Advocate SR.No. 72210,72167 ASK(19/11/2018) TCA.No.193 of 2017
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan