Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.srm Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-33

High Court 23 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.srm Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-33
Date of order
23 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
2005-06, 2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S.srm Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-33, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawnin the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 23.3.2016 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIANandThe Honourable Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY Tax Case Appeal No.963 of 2010 The Commissioner of IncomeTax, Chennai....Appellant/RespondentVs M/s.SRM Hotels Pvt. Ltd.,Chennai-33....Respondent/Appellant APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 30.3.2010 made in I.T.A.No.1356/Mds/2009on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B'Bench for the assessment year 2005-06 against the order of theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Chennai 34, made in ITA181/06-07 dated 01.06.2009 against the order of the AssistantCommissioner of Income tax, Central Circle I(3), Chennai 34dated 29.12.2006 in PaN No. for the Assessment year2005-2006. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.SenthilkumarFor Respondent : Dr.Anita Sumanth JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J The tax effect of this appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Thecase also does not fall under any of the exceptions laid down inparagraph 8 of the circular. 2. Therefore, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawnin the light of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The question of law isleft unanswered. No costs. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy//Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) I, Chennai 34. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle I(3),Chennai 34. +1 cc to Mrs.Anitha Sumanth, Advocate, sr.18424 +1 cc to Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, Advocate, sr.18882 TCA.No.963 of 2010 ca co kra 06.04.2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan